Scoping Study, Systematic Scoping Review, Scoping Report, Scope of the Evidence, Rapid Scoping Review, Structured Literature Review, Scoping Project, Scoping Meta Review
"Scoping reviews have great utility for synthesizing research evidence and are often used to [categorize or group] existing literature in a given field in terms of its nature, features, and volume." Note: Often a scoping review is confused with a mapping review. They are two different types of descriptive reviews and are not systematic reviews, but the methodology is closely related.
According to Grant and Booth (2009), Scoping reviews are "preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research)."
Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18:143.
Peters M, Godfrey C, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:141-146.
Morris M, Boruff J, and G Gore. Scoping Reviews: establishing the role of the librarian. J Med Lib Assoc. 2016;104(4):346-353.
Khalil H, Peters M, Godfrey C, et al. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2016;00:0,1-6.
Arksey H. and O'Malley L. Scoping Studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005;8(1):19-32.
Pham MT, Rajic A, Greig JD, et al. A Scoping Review of Scoping Reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods. 2014;5(4):371-385.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien K. Scoping Studies: Advancing the Methodology. Implementation Science. 2010; 5(1).