Skip to Main Content

Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences

About this Guide

This guide will help you:

  • Learn what a literature review is, it's purpose, and the difference between literature reviews and other evidence synthesis methods
  • Learn how to plan a literature review and formulate your research question
  • Provide resources and guidance for searching 
  • Provide resources, tips, and tools for writing literature reviews
  • Learn about other related publishing support resources provided by the library

Literature Review Definition

Non-systematic literature reviews, or narrative reviews are a method of knowledge synthesis, but do not have the stringent methodologies or reporting standards of systematic-type reviews. Narrative reviews do not require a clinically focused research question and inclusion/exclusion criteria are not usually explicitly described. Because a systematic search of the literature is not required for this type of review, a methodology section is not mandatory. Included studies are not evaluated for quality and no risk of bias is performed. Narrative reviews may address more than a single question and are useful for addressing general debates, identifying current lack of knowledge, providing rationales for future research, or speculating on types of interventions available.

Characteristics of a Literature Review

  • Gathers and synthesizes existing research on a specific topic in one place​.
  • Can be a stand-alone article, or part of a paper, book, dissertation, or project​.
  • These may be referred to as narrative reviews.
  • An effective review offers a functional overview of existing research by:​
  • Outlining important research trends in the conversation​
  • Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of existing research​
  • Identifying potential gaps in knowledge​
  • Establishing a need for current and/or future research projects

Purpose of a Literature Review

Why are literature reviews important?​​

  • Literature reviews give context: They explain the information landscape around a topic and they can capture the state of research in your field. ​

  • Literature reviews help identify where further research is needed in a field. It finds gaps and raises questions that need to be answered. ​

  • Literature reviews prove that you know what you’re talking about! A well-written lit review gives legitimacy to your claims and contextualizes them to others. It shows your expertise in a topic.​

  • For clinicians, “literature reviews can save valuable time when reviewing or searching for information about patient care by condensing a great amount of information into a few pages. The clinician can read one paper instead of sifting through the whole of the literature to find the answer to a clinical question…”​

The Difference Between Literature Reviews and Systematic Reviews

  Literature Review Systematic Review
Definition Qualitatively summarizes evidence on a topic using informal or subjective methods to collect and interpret studies. High-level overview of primary research on a focused question that identifies, selects, synthesizes, and appraises all high quality research evidence relevant to that question.
Goals Provide summary or overview of topic
  • Answer a focused clinical question 
  • Eliminate bias
Question Can be a general topic or a specific question
  • Clearly defined and answerable clinical question
  • Recommend using PICO as a guide
Number of Authors One or more Three or more
Timeline Weeks to months
  • Months to years
  • Average 18 months
Requirements
  • Understanding of topic
  • Perform searches on one or more databases
  • Thorough knowledge of topic
  • Perform searches on all relevant databases and grey literature sources
Value Provides summary of literature on a topic
  • Connects practicing clinicians to high quality evidence
  • Supports evidence-based practice

To learn more about systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis methods check out: